<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"

xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssMod
ule">

<channel>
<title>Rebuilding Media</title>
<link>/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</link>
<description>The fate of media</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>dorian@benkoil.com</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-07T07:42:06-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>What&apos;s a Community News Site&apos;s Obligation? (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2009/04/07/whats_a_community_news_sites_obligation.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The below is from Steve Outing, who posits that allowing only paid subscribers to participate fully in a community’s news site can be a component of a valid business model. He may be right. But what about the competing issue of blocking those who haven’t paid from commenting and participating. Do we create a separate class of reader/citizen? Does the paper have an obligation along these lines? Not taking a position. Just asking the question.</p>

<blockquote>A paid subscription also will allow you to interact with the site and its staff, and participate in discussions, daily chats and comment threads; free readers won’t have their voices heard. (I have to say, this is not a bad idea. Many popular newspaper Web sites have comment threads that are out of control and populated largely, it sometimes seems, by idiots who drown out the sane and smart voices. Charging to be part of the conversation is one way to create more rational, intelligent and useful discussions — albeit smaller — between journalists and readers, and readers and other readers.)</blockquote>
<a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/stopthepresses_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003958801">
Can Former Newspaper Employees Invent a Brave New News Model?</a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73823@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Newspapers</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-04-07T07:42:06-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Meanwhile, Over at MediaFlect (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2009/03/30/meanwhile_over_at_mediaflect.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There've been an number of tech issues here on Rebuilding Media - apologies to any who've been affected. Until they're resolved, I'll be working more aggressively on <a href="http://www.mediaflect.com">MediaFlect</a> and <a href="http://nakedmedia.org">Naked Media</a>.</p>

<p>Dorian</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73812@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-03-30T17:40:12-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cambridge&apos;s Out of Town News survives (Ben Compaine)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2009/01/30/cambridges_out_of_town_news_survives.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm pleased to report that the Out of Town News kiosk in Harvard Square is not ready for a 30. It apparently has found a new proprietor. <a
href="http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2008/11/20/more_than_symbolic_out_of_town_news_in_harvard_square_to_close.php#384757">I wrote</a> in November that the long time owner was intent on
closing it when its lease expired at the end of that month. It agreed with the landlord-- the City of Cambridge-- to remain open through January while a new operator was sought.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/archive/x1708111519/Good-news-Newsstand-operator-to-take-over-Harvard-Squares-Out-of-Town-News">Cambridge Chronicle reported</a> last week that
there were four bidders. The high bidder was an outfit that runs several other newsstands in the Boston area. At $140 per square feet for the 451 square foot landmark, the rent will actually be a bit
higher than the previous owner paid. Reports of the death of Out of Town News were pre-mature.</p>
]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73709@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-01-30T12:38:58-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>TV Network Viewership Down. What&apos;s the Problem? (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2008/10/01/tv_network_viewership_down_whats_the_problem.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>TV viewership of broadcast shows is down. But why would watching in some fashion other than linear broadcast be considered a negative? <a href="http://mediaflect.blogspot.com/2008/10/broadcast-tv-down-sure-but-whats-total.html">More here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73560@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-10-01T14:50:53-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Covering Online News Association Conference (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2008/09/12/covering_online_news_association_conference.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>See http://www.twitter.com/dorianbenkoil also </p>

<p>and the ONA site: http://journalists.org/2008conference/.</p>

<p>Later, here and/or mediaflect.com.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73537@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-09-12T13:53:08-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>This is WSJ Breaking News Why, Exactly? (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2008/07/21/this_is_wsj_breaking_news_why_exactly.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Alex Rodriguez is a star, and it's a big deal in advertising and entertainment circles that he's signed with a given talent agency. But why exactly is this worth interrupting us on Monday evening (I'm signed up for general Wall Street Journal alerts, not every last smidgeon of entertainment or sports news).</p>

<blockquote>WSJ.com Editors to DORIAN
show details 7:40 PM (1 hour ago)
	
Reply

<p>__________________________________<br />
NEWS ALERT<br />
from The Wall Street Journal</p>

<p><br />
July 21, 2008</p>

<p>New York Yankees star Alex Rodriguez has signed on with the William Morris Agency. William Morris, the Beverly Hills, Calif.-based talent representation company, has a client list that includes some of the biggest names in entertainment, sports and the corporate world. For Mr. Rodriguez, the move marks the latest turn in his relationship with Scott Boras, one of baseball's most successful and controversial agents. Mr. Boras, who has represented Mr. Rodriguez throughout his career, said he will continue to represent Mr. Rodriguez in any baseball-related negotiations.</p>

<p>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121667673378471533.html?mod=djemalertNEWS</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73454@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-07-21T20:15:17-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Future of NYTimes (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2008/06/10/future_of_nytimes.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Twittering Argyle Executive Forum call on Future of NYTimes. Twitter.com name: DorianBenkoil. Or feed is in right column of mediaflect.com.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73356@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-06-10T09:46:54-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>It&apos;s Official: WSJ Not Free (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2008/01/24/its_official_wsj_not_free.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the <a href="http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2008/01/16/the_wall_street_journal_online_wants_todoes_not_want_to_be_free_part_7.php">rumor</a> was true: WSJ is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB120119406286813757.html?mod=blog">not going fully free</a>, according to Murdoch, in Davos.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73051@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-01-24T13:25:26-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Wall Street Journal Online Wants to/Does not want to be free, Part 7 (Ben Compaine)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2008/01/16/the_wall_street_journal_online_wants_todoes_not_want_to_be_free_part_7.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Did <a href="http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2007/11/14/murdoch_to_set_wsj_online_free_sees_decline_in_television_profit.php">I say</a> in November that Rupert Murdoch said that the Wall Street Journal Online would do better with a totally ad supported business model? As Emily Latella would have said,  “Never mind.”</p>

<p>We had <a href="http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2007/08/06/the_wall_street_journal_free_and_strategy.php">some discussion here</a>  last summer on the scenarios that might justify a free strategy, wherein lower ad rates and foregoing $60 million or whatever in subscription revenue could be made up by 10x greater readership. </p>

<p>Apparently the new owner of Dow Jones is backing off.  <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/murdoch-bury-leder-rethinks-journal-strategy">A report on a <em>Wall Street Journal</em> bureau chiefs’ meeting</a> last week says that “Murdoch has scaled back his ambition to make WSJ.com entirely free.” According to one who was there “He said he originally thought making it free would bring in the biggest audience, but that after studying it it’s not as simple as he thought.”  </p>

<p>It rarely is.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73028@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-01-16T23:20:54-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Benazir Bhutto Front Page Roundup (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2007/12/28/benazir_bhutto_front_page_roundup.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>SAJA, the South Asia Journalists Association, has a <a href="http://www.sajaforum.org/2007/12/bhutto-front-pa.html">roundup</a> of front pages covering the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Many carry the same image if a distraught man.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72974@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-12-28T15:27:35-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNET Shuts Down Its Reader (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2007/12/12/cnet_shuts_down_its_reader.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Could this be a sign that there's not enough room in the market for all the feed readers? (I know I'm not alone in wondering why we need so many different ones, and when the shakeout would come.)</p>

<p>CNET.com has, <a href="http://www.congoo.com/user/FullComment?comid=395&Category_ID=-1&Channel_ID=2&Channel=Media%20&%20Advertising">they say in an email</a>, decided to turn off Newsburst, their attempt at a feed reader page.<br />
 They will provide a link for people to import their favorite feeds to other means.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72936@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-12-12T18:08:15-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Murdoch confirms WSJ Online wants to be free (Ben Compaine)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2007/11/13/murdoch_confirms_wsj_online_wants_to_be_free.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Reuters <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/21766547">reported</a> that News Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch said on Tuesday he was planning to boost the numbers of subscribers to the Wall Street Journal's Web site more than tenfold by making access free.</p>

<p>"We are studying it and we expect to make that free, and instead of having 1 million (subscribers) having at least 10-15 million in every corner of the earth." </p>

<p>No ambiguity there.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72860@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-11-13T13:40:02-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>More Thoughts on TimesSelect (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2007/09/19/more_thoughts_on_timesselect.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't want to bump Ben's post down with a long one of my own, when some of what I say overlaps, so I'll just point <a href="http://mediaflect.blogspot.com/2007/09/nyt-while-quality-isnt-exclusive-or.html">over here </a>to my thoughts on TimesSelect, some remarks from the NY Times' publisher Arthur Sulzberger, Rupert Murdoch, and where it's heading.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72689@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-09-19T12:00:33-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pulitzer: WSJ gets 2, Heavy on NY (Dorian Benkoil)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2007/04/16/pulitzer_wsj_gets_2_heavy_on_ny.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Pulitzers <a href="http://www.pulitzer.org/index.html">are out</a>. Surprisingly, <em>Wall Street Journal</em> is the only one with two, this time. And it's heavy on NY-area, as usual, and East Coast, as well.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72219@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-04-16T14:56:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The challenge of media competition from ground level (Ben Compaine)</title>
<link>http://rebuildingmedia.corante.com/archives/2007/03/02/the_challenge_of_media_competition_from_ground_level.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117272122936023020.html">This letter </a>to The Wall Street Journal yesterday succinctly sums up the state of competition in the media world today and the rapidity with which the landscape is changing. It helps explain why the National Association of Broadcasters, of all special interest groups, is opposing this particular flavor of radio merger. </p>

<blockquote><strong>XM and Sirius</strong><br>
March 1, 2007; Page B7

<p>The thought that a merger between XM and Sirius could create a monopoly is absurd ("<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117203002192914568.html">Making Radio Waves</a>," Review & Outlook, Feb. 21). They would offer only one of many content options for consumers. It's a moot point anyway. By the time the merger is completed, satellite radio will have won the battle with radio but lost the war. When I subscribed to XM three years ago, I immediately quit listening to traditional radio. Satellite radio is simply a superior choice. However, now that my 927 favorite songs reside on my iPod, I have little need for radio of any kind. Why scan the dial in hopes of finding a song that I like when my iPod contains only songs that I like?</p>

<p>Scott Stolz<br />
Tarpon Springs, Fla.</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72091@/home/corante/public_html/rebuildingmedia/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-03-02T10:41:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/</creativeCommons:license>
</channel>
</rss>